CHRIST
FULFILLED THE OLD COVENANT AND BECAME THE MEDIATOR OF THE NEW COVENANT
Hebrews
9:1-15
Key Verse: 9:12
1.
What
was the tabernacle of Israel? What was the role of the tabernacle in the first covenant?
(v1)
a.
Heb.
9:1 - The first covenant had regulations for both worship and an earthly sanctuary.
b.
The
tabernacle was set up while Israel was roaming in the wilderness and was made of tents and moved about with
people.(Ex. 40:34-38) (cf. tent of the meeting Ex. 33:7-11)
c.
The
tabernacle was a place to serve God, located at the center of Israel’s habitat.
d.
The
tabernacle was a tent, as a copy of the heavenly sanctuary
e.
The
tabernacle was made by Israel during their time in the wilderness, instructed
by God through Moses, simultaneously given by God along with the Law.
f.
So,
the Law and tabernacle cannot be separated. The tabernacle was the epicenter of
working out the Law out—the meeting place with God.
2.
What
was the content and role of the holy place? What things were in the most holy
place? (2-5)
a.
Heb.
9:2 - A tabernacle was set up. In its first room, there were the lampstand, the
table, and the consecrated bread; this was called the Holy Place.
b.
Heb.
9:3 - Behind the second curtain, was a room called the Most Holy Place (Heb.
9:4), which had the golden altar of incense and the gold-covered Ark of the Covenant.
This Ark contained the gold jar of manna, Aaron’s staff that had budded, and
the stone tablets of the covenant—(Heb. 9:5). Above the ark, were the Cherubim
of Glory, overshadowing the atonement
cover, but we cannot discuss these things in detail now.
c.
According to Ex. 30:6-8, the altar was in
front of the curtain of the Most Holy place. On the Day of Atonement, the high
priest is to offer incense (Lev 16:12-13) on this altar; otherwise, ‘death’
will come. This is closely linked to the Most Holy place as one went up to meet
God. The altar and the Most Holy place could not be thought of separately in
the process of meeting God in the tabernacle. This is the purpose of this
statement.
3.
Who
has access to the Most Holy place for what purpose and on what occasion? Why
did God put up such controlled access to
the Most Holy Place among His people? How does it reflect the heavenly
sanctuary and how is it different from it?
a.
Heb.
9:6 - When everything was arranged like this, the priests entered regularly
into the outer room to carry on their ministry.
b.
Heb.
9:7 - Only the high priest entered the inner room, and that only once a year,
and never without blood, which he offered for himself and for the sins the
people had committed in ignorance.
c.
The
Holy Place was the place of work for the high priest every day, but access to the Most Holy place was extremely
limited. Here we can understand two
characteristics of God: one, God was eager to be with His people, and two, God specifically instructed Moses to set up a
tabernacle where people can meet with Him. It was initiated and set up by God’s
own will. His presence in the form of a cloud was noted over the tabernacle, yet men’s access to God
was extremely limited. As follows:
d.
Only
the high priest— the one chosen by God-- needed blood, and was not exempt from
God’s stipulations for performing sacrifices:
i.
To
be performed only once a year—very seldom but must be repeated again and again
ii.
To
be performed only with blood—the essence of sin and forgiveness
e.
Here
we can understand that God wants to be with man and wants us to come to Him,
but this was hampered by the nature of our sinfulness. Yet He was determined to provide
access to Himself by these control, the essence of which is ‘blood’, yet the
blood of animals did not open wide the way to the Lord. Sacrifices must be
repeated again and again; the way remained available, yet mysterious.
4.
What
does the Holy Spirit tell us about the significance of the tabernacle in
relationship to the heavenly sanctuary? (8-10)
a.
Heb.
9:8 The Holy Spirit was showing by this that the way into the Most Holy Place
had not yet been disclosed as long as the first tabernacle was still standing.
There is the place of God, called the Most Holy Place; it is available for all men
to come.
b.
Heb.
9:9 This is an illustration for the present time, indicating that the gifts and
sacrifices being offered were not able to clear the conscience of the
worshiper. Our time is the time of Jesus, whose sacrifice earned us an access
to the heavenly sanctuary. As of now, since we have experienced the perfect,
heavenly sanctuary, we come to know that the imperfection of the old one is
fully revealed when the perfect one comes. This works at the hearts and
consciences of men.
c.
Heb.
9:10 This is a matter of food and drink and
various ceremonial washings—external regulations applying until the time of the
new order; the old one was only a shadow of the real one—the blood of Jesus Christ. Jesus’ perfect sacrifice ends the old way of
sacrificing. As far as sacrificing was concern, it is done away with by the
blood of Jesus, offered to the heavenly sanctuary and opening an access to the
Most Holy Place, a copy of the true tabernacle in heaven.
5.
Which
sanctuary did Jesus enter and with what (11-12)? Think about what “entering the
Most Holy Place by his own blood” means. What does it mean that it is not man-made
and not part of this world? Why was it possible for Jesus to obtain eternal
redemption? What did he bring as a sacrifice? How was the effectiveness of
Jesus’ blood different from that of the blood of an animal (Num. 19:1-10,14)?
Why?
a.
Here
is the difference between offering the
old and the new.
b.
Heb.
9:11 When Christ came as high priest of the good things that are already here,
he went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not man-made,
that is to say, not a part of this creation. It was not the tabernacle on the
earth that Jesus brought his blood to, but to the heavenly sanctuary; he was
crucified on the cross at the Mount of Calvary, and was looking up to heaven as
he gave himself..
c.
Heb.
9:12 He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves, but he entered
the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal
redemption. His blood is powerful enough to be effective eternally for all; through
this, it is quite clear that sin could
not be done away with by the blood of animals. Jesus, the innocent Son of God,
shed his blood to purify men from the
effects of sin.
6.
What
is the power of Jesus’ blood (14)? What is the reason he became the mediator of the new covenant?
What is the primary difference brought by this new covenant (15)? Think about the
God who set up an earthly tabernacle and sent Jesus as a sacrifice to the heavenly
sanctuary.
a.
Heb.
9:14 How much more, than, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal
Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts
that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God! The death of Jesus on
the cross resulted in the shedding of all of his blood, which was quite graphic.
i.
Jesus’
death was a sacrifice— a total change is understanding the cross of Jesus (this transference is
clearly seen in Isaiah 53:1-3 to 53:4-6)
ii.
This
was more graphic as he died on the cross, shedding all of his blood.
iii.
All
these were meaningful in two ways—a. Jesus is the unblemished King and Lord,;
yet he offered himself; b. this sacrifice was of the Spirit, before God, filled with total submission and obedience in
trust (the true nature of being unblemished)
b.
Heb.
9:15 For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant; that those who
are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance—now that he has died as
a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.
i.
offering
of himself, unblemished, to God is the key that made Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, that is
actually carried out by ‘dying as a ransom to set people free from their sins’
ii.
The
ultimate goal and outcome of such mediation is to endow the promised eternal
inheritance to those who are called.
c.
There
are a few differences between the old and the new covenants.
i.
The
high priest offered the blood of an animal; Jesus offered his own blood
ii.
The
animal sacrifices were unable to make them acceptable to God and could not enable
them to receive the eternal inheritance; Jesus’ sacrifice was able to cleanse
consciences, enabling them to be accepted by God
iii.
Animal
sacrifices never set them free; Jesus set those who received him free from sins
committed under the first covenant
iv. Jesus’
death met the requirement of the first covenant fully. The first covenant was never
fully met until the new one came (Gal
4:4-5Gal 4:4). But when the time came, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born
under the law (Gal 4:5), to redeem those under law, that we might receive the
full rights of sons.
No comments:
Post a Comment