Matthew 26:57-68;
27:11-26
Key Verse – Matthew 26:64
Introduction
In
last week’s message, there were two events: Jesus made his decision to give his
life for his disciples clear as he prayed to his Father, God, in their presence,
and he was arrested soon after and tried twice, once before the high priest and
again before Pilate. In these trials, he
was charged with and convicted of blasphemy because of his claims to be the Son
of God, and treason against the government because of his claims to be the King
of the Jews.
As
we go through today’s passages, I would like to explore what it means for Jesus
to be charged in these two different courts and on these two different
accounts.
1.
Jesus’ trial in the high
priests’ court
Not
long after midnight, Jesus was arrested in the Garden of Gethsemane on the
Mount of Olives by a large crowd dispatched by the chief priests and teachers
of the law. Jesus was taken immediately to Caiaphas’ house, where all teachers
of the law, high priests, and elders had gathered together to make a decision about
him. Most likely, the entire Sanhedrin had gathered to try Jesus.
One
thing we know about this assembly is that they were composed of a few different
sects: the Pharisees, the teachers of the Law, and the Sadducees. The Herodians
might have even been a part of this group. Each of these groups had a
distinctive perspective on faith and they did not get along well. But at this
time, they had all gotten together. When naming these three groups, Matthew
expressed it differently, as the high priests and the whole Sanhedrin, meaning
that Israel’s entire leadership had gotten together to try Jesus early that morning.
The
purpose for this was clear; they were determined to come up with something that
would incriminate him enough to be worthy of death (Mark 14:59).
Why?
Jesus came and taught people about God’s truth and served them with healings
and miracles. As a result, the whole nation followed Jesus. Jesus also rebuked
them for their ungodliness and evil; however, instead of repenting of their
sins, they decided to kill him out of jealousy. Towards this goal, they mobilized
many men to testify against him, but simply they could not find any matching
testimonies. The most probable charge was brought up by two men: 'I am able to
destroy the temple of God and rebuild it in three days.’ (Mark 14:57-59).
Jesus
said something very similar in John 1, but even this claim was not the same
thing that he had said. If this was true, then Jesus was worthy of death,
according to the Roman law. However, Jesus was silent; he did not defend
himself against this charge, even though it was totally wrong. Although he knew
of their evil intentions, Jesus did not defend himself against this charge at
all.
When
the high priest could not find any tangible evidence or charges against Jesus, he
became impatient, got up, and shouted in Jesus’ face:
"Are you not going
to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against
you?"(Mark 14:60).
Jesus
did not answer; he was determined not to answer. Why? Because he was determined
to absorb all the charges, no matter how bad they might be[B1] .
When
Jesus did not answer, the high priest became extremely disturbed in fear that
he could not get anything out of his mouth and would be unable to get him to
make any self-incriminating remarks. His best chance was slipping through his
hands, so he got to the bottom of the issue:
"I charge you under
oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of God." (Matthew
26:63).
He
demanded an answer, not just before him, but also before God; therefore, it
must be true and genuine. How did Jesus respond?
"You have said
so," Jesus replied.” (Matthew 26:64a).
For
the first time, he broke the silence and answered the truth about his identity as
the Son of the living God, the Messiah; however, he also volunteered more truth
about himself.
"But I say to all of
you: From now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the
Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven." (Matthew 26:64b).
As
soon as the high priest heard this, he expressed great indignation and sorrow
over Jesus’ words. So he tore his clothes and said,
"He has spoken
blasphemy! Why do we need any more witnesses? Look, now you have heard the
blasphemy.” (Matthew 26:65).
What
did he mean by this?
By
calling himself the Son of the living God, Jesus was claiming to be a deity, a
god. This was a violation of the first three of the Ten Commandments. How can a
mere man call himself a god, the Son of God?! How dare any human being say that
he is the Son of the living God?
So
in the high priest’s mind, it was all too clear that Jesus had committed a
blasphemy, but he asked the rest. We don’t know how many were there; as little
as 20 or as many as 70, if most of the Sanhedrin members were present. Each of
them had heard what Jesus said and agreed with the high priest, expressing
their indignation in this way:
"He is worthy of
death," they answered. Then they spit in his face and struck him with
their fists. Others slapped him and said, "Prophesy to us, Messiah. Who
hit you?" (Matthew 26:66b-68).
If
Jesus truly was the Son of God, he must be able to do all these things! Because
he is God! In their minds, Jesus had no such power, so he could not do it, proving
that he was not the Son of God.
According
to the Law of Moses, such blasphemers must be stoned to death on the spot; no
one should dare to say a word in public that defames the name of God Almighty. However,
Jesus seemed to do this affirmatively, unashamedly, and unambiguously. He did this
because He was the Son of the living God, standing in front of these sinful men
in obedience to his Father.
In
their minds, weakness and humility could never be an asset or characteristic of
God. How could God still be God in weakness? Even if Jesus may be truly God, I
would not believe in such a God!
Who
could think or imagine that God Almighty had come down to be like one of them
and was begging for their attention and mercy? It is beyond the human mind and,
in human faculties, there is no such possibility imaginable.
So,
what were these people actually thinking about Jesus? They were obviously
thinking that Jesus was just a son of man, like their fellow members! Son of
God! No way! You are just a son of man!
2.
Jesus, a son of man is the Son of Man .
Along
this line of thought, Jesus made a very revealing remark. Though he kept silent
to so many of the charges, he willingly offered this information; it was so
important for them, as well as for us all, to know more about ‘the Jesus’ now
standing in front of these powerful dignitaries and authorities in chains as a
captive, a prisoner, a criminal.
From
now on, they would see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty
One and coming on the clouds of heaven.
a.
The
Son of Man:
Jesus
called himself the Son of Man during his ministry. This title is used more
extensively Matthew than in any of the other gospels. It is used in two aspects:
one in regards to his earthly nature, and the other, Jesus called himself this
when he was talking about coming in his glory. There are a few examples of each
of these aspects:
First, we will look at Jesus as the Son of Man,
in regards to his earthly human nature. This was a paradoxical reminder of his
true identity as the Son of God. He was incarnate in flesh but looked exactly
like us in every other aspect of his life. Also, by calling himself the Son of Man,
he was clearly reminding his disciples that he was not just a Son of Man, but also
the Son of God.
“The
Son of Man coming in glory” is a particular figure that Daniel mentioned in his
prophecy (Daniel 7). In this prophecy, there were four beasts that represented
succeeding kingdoms. At the end of these beasts’ reigns comes the Son of Man.
He bore the figure of a man, representing a kingdom, just as the four beasts
were. And just as each beast characterized the nature of different kingdoms, so
did the Son of Man. This kingdom was the kingdom of God coming in glory and the
king was Jesus.
So
by calling himself the Son of Man, Jesus made it clear to those who put their trust
in him that, even though he looked and lived like a mere human being, he was
not just a human son of man; he was the
Son of Man coming in God’s power to establish the godly kingdom foretold by
the prophet Daniel (Daniel 7:13).
Simply,
the Son of Man was another name for the coming Messiah! But its emphasis was on
the fact that Jesus was and looked like any other human being. No one should
fail to notice God’s presence in the human Jesus!
When
the high priest looked at Jesus in chains, weak and helpless, he could not
overcome his own understanding; the same was true for each of the Sanhedrin
members. However, by remembering that the Son of Man was not just a human
being, but that the Son of Man would come in glory, these people may open their
spiritual eyes to see the Son of Man in God’s glory, through this helplessly
beaten man.
So
Jesus was going up to heaven to be seated beside God Almighty and would come
down in glory. Next, let us look at the phrase ‘from now on’.
b.
‘From now on’
This
is a time indicator. What does now mean? It is the time when Jesus was about to
suffer and die to redeem men from their sins, in full obedience to God the
Father. In a matter of hours, he would die on the cross! In matter of only a
few days, he would die, resurrect, and be fully accredited or qualified to sit
with God the Father in His glory! Not only that, but with that glory, Jesus
will come back to establish God’s eternal kingdom.
This
was the essence of the Son of Man’s work: to pay off men’s sins and to fully
obey the Father, so that God may be fully honored and glorified. This work earned
him a place beside God the Father in glory! Simply speaking, Jesus’ suffering
and death had to happen before he could take his place of glory in the heavens.
This is clearly explained in Philippians 2:8-9.
“And being found in
appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death-- even
death on a cross! Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him
the name that is above every name” (Philippians 2:8-9 NIV).
So
‘from now on’ referring to his impending crucifixion, Jesus was certain of his coming
glory through his resurrection and ascension into heaven to sit beside God the
Father.
Then
where, in this helpless figure of Jesus in chains, can we find the power of the
Son of God Almighty? Did Jesus temporarily relinquish his power as the Son? No!
He used his power to give his life as ransom and to obey God, even to the point
of death! This is the power of the Son of God; he did not use the power to
judge, condemn, or destroy sinners!
To
human eyes, the power is only real when it can destroy and subdue its enemies
by force. In such a mindset, no one recognizes Jesus’ power as the Son of God.
This is well revealed in 1 Corinthians 1:18.
“For the message of the
cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved
it is the power of God.” (1Corinthians 1:18 NIV).
During
this trial, Jesus was charged with blasphemy and the verdict, according to the
Law of Moses delivered by Israel’s religious leaders, was death
3.
Jesus’ trial in the Roman
governor, Pilate’s court [Matthew 27:11].
Soon
after they decided to pronounce the death sentence on Jesus, the chief priests
and the elders brought him before Pilate, the Roman governor. By this time, it
was probably already midmorning
“Meanwhile Jesus stood
before the governor, and the governor asked him, "Are you the king of the
Jews?" "You have said so," Jesus replied.” (Matthew 27:11).
The
primary charge against Jesus was that he claimed to be the king of the Jews.
What might be the significance of this?
During the time of his trial, there were no kings; all the kings were either called tetrarch or Governor. If anyone was called king, this was seen as an offense to the one and only king, Caesar.
During the time of his trial, there were no kings; all the kings were either called tetrarch or Governor. If anyone was called king, this was seen as an offense to the one and only king, Caesar.
But
when Pilate looked at him, Jesus seemed too mild and calm to be a king. So,
Pilate first asked him if he was the king of the Jews. Surprisingly, Jesus
answered ‘you have said so.’ Calmly but firmly, Jesus affirmed that he was the
king of the Jews. The Jewish people had not had a king for a long time, more
than 500 years at least; for the last 80 years, Jews had been under Roman power.
So Jesus’ assertion that he was the king of Jews was strange and puzzling; he
did not have an army or any power to be the king of the Jews. In the ordinary sense, Pilate could not understand
the idea that Jesus was a king and a threat to Roman power.
When
the chief priests and elders sensed that Pilate was not convinced of their
charges, they made many accusations against Jesus, but he did not respond to
any of them.
“But Jesus made no reply,
not even a single charge – to the great amazement of the governor.” (Matthew
27:14).
Why
was Pilate so greatly amazed?
It
is more than likely that Pilate had conducted many trials and seen pretty much
all kinds of human responses to many different criminal charges. Many of them would
cry, yell, shout, become angry, plead, and beg with bitterness and sorrow. He
had never seen a man behave like Jesus. Though the charge was very serious,
though people were making so many charges against him, Jesus was calm with
peace and dignity. How was such a thing possible when facing certain death?
Also,
Jesus was called the Messiah. Pilate was not unaware of the fact that Jesus had
done many powerful works; however, here, he was unperturbed and did not
exercise any of his power. It seemed as if he really was a king, though he was
in chains.
What
did Pilate know about why Jesus was brought to him?
“For he knew it was out
of self-interest that they had handed Jesus over to him.” (Matthew 27:18).
The
high priests and the elders brought many charges against Jesus, but Pilate knew
the situation well and was convinced that Jesus was innocent. Simply, the
charges made against Jesus were out of their own self-interest! In addition, it
was not only him who felt this way:
“While Pilate was sitting
on the judge's seat, his wife sent him this message: "Don't have anything
to do with that innocent man, for I have suffered a great deal today in a dream
because of him." (Matthew 27:19).
With
his own conviction as well as his wife’s warning, Pilate decided to avoid any
judgment on Jesus. So he offered a solution:
“Now it was the
governor's custom at the festival to release a prisoner chosen by the crowd. At
that time they had a well-known prisoner whose name was Jesus Barabbas.
So when the crowd had gathered, Pilate asked them, "Which one do you want
me to release to you: Jesus Barabbas, or Jesus who is called the Messiah?"
(Matthew 27:15-17).
Pilate
wanted to release Jesus, but the chief priests and elders persuaded the crowds,
who joined them in condemning him to death. Were they coerced by these
authorities? It is possible, not likely. They persuaded them, by injecting their reasoning and ideas to
them; the crowd concurred with the priests’ influential arguments. How could a
powerless man be the Messiah? He was in chains with ragged clothes. Could this
man be the Messiah? No! So the crowd demanded the release of Barabbas and the
crucifixion of Jesus.
Crucifixion
was the worst form of execution. It was used frequently by the Romans,
particularly on rebels against the Roman authority. These crowds wanted to
treat Jesus like those rebels. Since he claimed to be the king of Jews, he was
rebelling against the current governing authorities.
This
was the result of their angst; their hopes, thought to be fully proven yet
fully disappointed, were shattered and they felt betrayed by Jesus, the Son of
God.
How
high was their angst?
“They shouted all the
louder! Crucify him! Crucify him!” (Matthew 27:23).
Could
Pilate overcome the force of this crowd? Was his conviction strong enough to
release Jesus against their overwhelming demands? He could not overcome them.
“When Pilate saw that he
was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and
washed his hands in front of the crowd. "I am innocent of this man's
blood," he said. "It is your responsibility!" (Matthew 27:24).
Pilate
yielded to their decision and turned Jesus over to be crucified; however, he
could not escape his conviction that Jesus was innocent and that he had become a
part of the murder of the Messiah, the King of the Jews! So he took water and
washed his hands in front of the crowd. "I am innocent of this man's
blood," he said. "It is your responsibility!" (Matthew ).
He
evaded his responsibility. He had the power to release Jesus, but he did not
because of his fear that he might lose his job. He rejected Jesus just as much
as the religious leaders and the crowd did[B2] . This means that, despite
their varying forms of rejection, they each concurred and acted in line with
the religious leaders in condemning Jesus on the accounts of blasphemy and
rebellion against human authority. What was the nature of the rejection that
led to Jesus’ condemnation? We will explore this as we review the
three forms of their rejection:
·
The
high priests and Sanhedrin: in order to uphold their power and authority to
claim that they were right and Jesus, the Son of God, was wrong, they resided
in their own self-righteousness in the Law. Who might fit into this category
today? There are many religious orders in this world, who pursue their own righteousness.
If God is living, true, and righteous, then He must accept their good behavior
and grant them His blessings. But Jesus did not do so. Because of this he shall
not be the Messiah. So, they reject Jesus’ way of salvation
insisting on their ways.
·
The
crowds: Jesus failed to meet their needs, i.e. as the Messiah. They believed
that God was merciful and must save them, regardless of their sins; however, Jesus
failed to meet their expectations for salvation. Many in this crowd saw
Jesus doing miracles and even received much love and healing from him. Even though
they were sure of Jesus’ power as the Savior for their lives, they just found
out that he was captured and condemned. Simply, he did not meet their
expectations. This is evident in Jesus’ arrest and sentencing as a blasphemer.
Who belonged in this category? One typical example is Judas. Though he had seen
all of Jesus’ godliness, as soon as it was certain that Jesus would die, he
jumped ship to benefit himself[BJ3] .
·
Pilate:
he
rejected Jesus for his personal wellbeing, even though he had position
and authority on this; as long as someone has no security over his life, they
will make the political decision, not based on the truth but based on their own
benefit and the common good. Pilate had to face Jesus, not by his own choice
but because he was forced to by the world. He thought that whatever happened to
Jesus was irrelevant to him, but he did not know that all humankind must face
Jesus and give an answer to him for whatever he did, whether good or bad. He blew
his only and best chance to welcome the Son of the living God by refusing to
honor him in the fullness of his power. Simply, he could have stood with the
truth that Jesus was innocent. He could have not washed his hand, saying, I am
innocent of his blood (Matthew 27:24b). Jesus’ life was at his disposal by his
own authority, something no one can escape.
In
this way, all have participated in charging Jesus of blasphemy and rebellion, but,
actually, these two charges must be turned against us for it is us who have
dishonored God and rebelliously rejected Him and His authority. Paul describes
the essence of men’s sin in this way:
“For although they knew
God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their
thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. (Romans 1:21
NIV).
”There is no one who
understands; there is no one who seeks God. All have turned away, they have
together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one."1
(Romans 3:11-12 NIV).
How
did Jesus handle these accusations?
Jesus
did not defend himself. The most prominent ‘action’ noted here is his silence.
He kept silence before both Caiaphas and Pilate. Caiaphas was frustrated by
Jesus’ silence but Pilate was greatly amazed by it. What was the reason for
Jesus’ silent response? It signified his determination and will to bear all the
wrongs and evils of these people on himself. Jesus’ silence was not weakness or
helplessness! In silence, he absorbed all their wrongdoings so as not to charge
them as they were doing to the Son of God.
What
was the sentence? It was execution by crucifixion. This sentencing took into
consdieration the verdict that he was guilty of both blasphemy and rebellion.
Anyone who blasphemed must be put to death, even by crucifixion. Jesus suffered on the cross, not because they
were the worst human beings, but because of the sins that we committed;
blasphemy and rebellion against God is worthy of such judgment. His execution
by crucifixion was the worst of its kind, speaking of just how vile and ungodly
our sins are.
During
the whole events of Jesus’ Passion, this was the time of when people most interacted.
The main purpose of this interaction was to charge Jesus and turn the people
away from him. Jesus took the charges and kept silent, in order for their sins to
not be held against them.
What
does this mean for us? Jesus said this to those who wanted to follow him as their
King and Savior.
“Then Jesus said to his
disciples, "Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take
up their cross and follow me.” (Matthew 16:24 NIV).
Could
you accept the charges brought against you, no matter what happens to you? Or would
you want to defend yourself? The world’s conflicts converge on one issue: who is
right and who is wrong? Who should take the blame? According to my
understanding, I am right and good, and anyone who is against me is bad and
wrong. So I prescribe this remedy - you have to repent or you will be punished.
The problem here is that it is not just ‘you’, ‘he’, or she who did wrong; ‘I’ have
done just as much evil and wrong as anyone else.
Jesus
clearly communicated his will to give his life as ransom; this was confirmed
when he prayed before God the Father. He carried out this will while he was on
trial. Jesus’ most important work at this time was to be silent against all the
charges they brought against him. He took all the charges upon himself and
absorbed them in silence, so that their
sins would not come back to them!
Likewise,
Jesus took away all our sins; because of this, we become his children and
servants, are enabled to love him, and call him our Lord and Savior. He said this
sobering word: if we want to follow him, we must deny ourselves, take up our
cross, and follow him.
It
all comes down to one thing: how will we handle all the charges made against
us? We can defend ourselves with all of our abilities, throwing around our
intelligent arguments, reasoning, bitter anger, threats, and so on. Or we can
take up our cross and follow Jesus in his silence toward all the charges made
against him, even though he knew very well how evil those charges were!
Jesus
is our Messiah and King. He is worthy of
our praise and honor, because he bore all our sins. He is worthy to follow; his
life is truth and that life must be ours as well.
May God richly bless you
in Christ!
No comments:
Post a Comment